Foreign media said China is considering adjusting nuclear arsenal will enter for the mode of information: Dongfeng China rocket army 31 intercontinental missile Reference News Network reported on February 27th Germany "international politics and society" magazine website published February 22nd "arms race 2" one article, author Hesse peace and conflict research fund researcher George franceschini. The article said that in 1970 the "Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty", the signatories will Bingzhe integrity commitment in the near future to end the nuclear arms race, to promote the effective measures of nuclear disarmament negotiations, and promised to universal and full disarmament in strict and effective international supervision under the treaty negotiations. So rigid language shows that the nuclear weapons holders and non nuclear countries have had a big difference in nuclear disarmament half a century ago. For decades, policymakers have devoted themselves to this hope. So, in a speech in Prague in 2009, Obama talked about a nuclear free world, which caused a sensation, but the hope was to say goodbye to twenty-first Century. The article said, simply look at the newspapers in recent weeks is enough to understand this: discuss the refugee crisis in Britain withdraw from the EU and the successor to the British Parliament during the like a raging fire, also equipped with nuclear warheads on its Trident nuclear submarine were consulted — estimated by independent experts, the cost of 100 billion pounds. On the other side of the Atlantic, London’s closest allies are unwilling to be compared: Washington is considering spending about $1 trillion to upgrade the United States’ land, sea and air arsenals in the next few decades. At the same time, China’s strategic makers are considering adjusting the nuclear arsenal to a faster (imminent) mode of preparation, and it dreams of building its own land, sea, air and nuclear umbrella and equipped with so-called multi warhead missiles for its missile program. To understand the interactive mode of people know Asian expansion, soon India will respond. This then will lead to further expansion of Pakistan. The article said that the memory of the Soviet era of Putin, the old tradition of nuclear threat from the cold war revived again, and pointed out that Russia’s nuclear arsenal will be a comprehensive modernization and new procurement. Nuclear powers have allowed their weapons of mass destruction to shine second springs in this century, just as their security situation and their status requirements are diverse. But one thing is for all countries are consistent: they think is restraint of the nuclear states, is forcing other nuclear powers to nuclear expansion. No one thinks he’s the driving force, and everyone thinks he’s the driving force. In addition, in the Pacific Russia’s territorial revisionism and Chinese requirements of the US military for appropriate. The article argues that such an apology is not only a bluff, because politics believes that the hidden reality behind this is the security dilemma, and that it is a signal of the new arms race of certainty. And in fact: look at the military interactive triangle of Beijing – New Delhi – Islamabad can be found early signs of a nuclear arms race in Asia, which may reach the buckle in twenty-first Century.

外媒称中国正考虑调整核武库 将进入备战模式 资料图:中国火箭军东风31洲际导弹   参考消息网2月27日报道 德国《国际政治与社会》杂志网站2月22日刊登《军备竞赛2.0》一文,作者为黑森和平与冲突研究基金会研究员乔治・弗兰切斯基尼。   文章称,在1970年的《不扩散核武器条约》里,签约国秉着正直的意愿承诺就在不远的将来结束核军备竞赛、推动核裁军的有效措施进行磋商,并承诺在严格有效的国际监管下就进行普遍和充分裁军的条约进行磋商。   如此生硬的语言显示,核武器的拥有者和非核国家在半个世纪之前对于核裁军的分歧已经有多大。几十年来,决策者们都致力于这一希望。例如此前奥巴马在2009年于布拉格进行的一次讲话中谈到了一个无核世界,这引发了轰动,但是这个希望眼看就要与21世纪说再见了。   文章称,简单看一下最近几个星期来的报纸就足以明白这点:在英国退出欧盟和难民危机的讨论如火如荼期间,英国国会还对其配备了核弹头的“三叉戟”核潜艇的后继型号进行了征询――据独立专家的估计,成本达到1000亿英镑。大西洋另外一边伦敦最紧密的盟友不愿意就这么被比下去:华盛顿正考虑斥资约1万亿美元在未来几十年内对美国的陆海空核武库进行全面升级。   与此同时,中国战略制定者正考虑将核武库调整到更快速(“一触即发”)的备战模式,它梦想着建立起自己的陆海空核保护伞并为自己的导弹计划配备所谓的多弹头导弹。了解亚洲扩军互动模式的人知道,用不了多久印度就会对此作出回应。这样紧接着就会引发巴基斯坦的进一步扩军。   文章称,怀念苏联时代的普京令源自冷战时期的核威胁的老传统再次复兴,并指出俄罗斯核武库将进行全面的现代化并进行新的采购。   核大国们在本世纪让它们的大规模杀伤性武器焕发第二春的原因就像它们的安全形势和它们的地位要求一样多种多样。但是有一点是所有国家都一致的:它们都自认为是克制的核国家,是被其他核大国逼迫才进行核扩军的。没有人认为自己是推动的力量,所有人都认为自己是被推动的力量。   此外,俄罗斯的修正主义和中国在太平洋的领土要求对美国的扩军理由来说再合适不过了。   文章称,这样的辩解不仅仅是虚张声势,因为政治学认为这背后隐藏的现实是安全上的困境,并认为它是确定无疑的新军备竞赛的信号。而且实际上:看一下北京―新德里―伊斯兰堡的扩军互动三角就可以发现亚洲核军备竞赛的初步迹象,这可能在21世纪达到扣人心弦的程度。目前亚洲各国的核弹头数量还在三位数的低端,它们的增长幅度还在可控范围内。但是如果中国决心加快走上与美国、俄罗斯核实力相匹敌的道路,那么这就将引发亚洲核扩军的灾难。   西方对亚洲正在崛起国家的核野心也负有一部分责任。首先,美国(和俄罗斯)的核裁军自冷战结束以来速度放慢,并在两国分别拥有几千枚核弹头时停顿下来。在这种情况下,呼吁核弹头还不到美国或俄罗斯核武库十分之一的中国和印度对扩军保持克制就显得没有什么说服力。   其次,美国在上世纪90年代醉心于“单极世界”时对“全方位的优势”滔滔不绝得过多了。眼下这个信息也传递到华盛顿的战略竞争对手那里,它们也希望借助核扩军表明它们不愿接受这样的从属地位。   第三,美国国会没有通过《全面禁止核试验条约》,因此给了它的亚洲竞争对手未来进行核试验的可乘之机。因为与华盛顿不同,长远来看北京、新德里和伊斯兰堡需要核试验来令自己的核武库进一步多样化。   最后还有《不扩散核武器条约》。英国重金购置新核潜艇的例子足以捅破西方核国家自我吹捧(“我们已经大幅削减并保持克制”)的窗户纸。相关的主题文章:

Comments are closed.
a b

Recent Posts